<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Joel Schwartz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joelaschwartz.net/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joelaschwartz.net</link>
	<description>A smattering of thoughts on philosophy, teaching and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:40:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Private Eyes Are Watching You&#8221; &#8211; Part Three by joelaschwartz</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=585#comment-6519</link>
		<dc:creator>joelaschwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=585#comment-6519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You offer an interesting possibility Nick. However, I&#039;m not sure that we will ever find such a society completely comfortable without undermining personal relationships. Parts Five and Six (which I&#039;m presently working on) will get into the importance of having certain intimacy that is not shared with others who are not a part of that relationship. 

You could argue that our present society has very little actually privacy given the amount of surveillance that goes on, coupled with the permanent record of all activity done on the internet. Because we are not constantly reminded of these things, we feel like we have privacy when in many situations, we have much less than we think.  Then again, if/when the time comes that we realize how much information is already known (or able to be know) by those with no connection, we&#039;ll let the desire for privacy in those situations go by the wayside. However, I&#039;m not sure we&#039;ll ever be comfortable allowing those outside personal relationships to be able to share (in a way) in the benefits and intimacy of those relationships.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You offer an interesting possibility Nick. However, I&#8217;m not sure that we will ever find such a society completely comfortable without undermining personal relationships. Parts Five and Six (which I&#8217;m presently working on) will get into the importance of having certain intimacy that is not shared with others who are not a part of that relationship. </p>
<p>You could argue that our present society has very little actually privacy given the amount of surveillance that goes on, coupled with the permanent record of all activity done on the internet. Because we are not constantly reminded of these things, we feel like we have privacy when in many situations, we have much less than we think.  Then again, if/when the time comes that we realize how much information is already known (or able to be know) by those with no connection, we&#8217;ll let the desire for privacy in those situations go by the wayside. However, I&#8217;m not sure we&#8217;ll ever be comfortable allowing those outside personal relationships to be able to share (in a way) in the benefits and intimacy of those relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Private Eyes Are Watching You&#8221; &#8211; Part Three by Nick Kallimani</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=585#comment-6512</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kallimani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=585#comment-6512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically, the biodome experiment is not a violation of the right to privacy. However, it is evident that being placed in that scenario is extremely unsettling. I feel as if the biodome situation is a violation of other rights, possibly the right not to feel oppressed or misled, if such rights exist. There is also another possibility entirely. What if society had developed with the presence of these so called monitoring devices and people lacked any sense or desire for privacy as we know it? Given enough time, theoretically people may become comfortable with their peers knowing intimate details of their lives since they believe there is no hope of keeping such things private, effectively removing the concept of privacy from society. The thought of people not knowing occurrences in your life may become foreign entirely. Another possibility is the idea of privacy evolving to only encompass what is on one&#039;s own mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, the biodome experiment is not a violation of the right to privacy. However, it is evident that being placed in that scenario is extremely unsettling. I feel as if the biodome situation is a violation of other rights, possibly the right not to feel oppressed or misled, if such rights exist. There is also another possibility entirely. What if society had developed with the presence of these so called monitoring devices and people lacked any sense or desire for privacy as we know it? Given enough time, theoretically people may become comfortable with their peers knowing intimate details of their lives since they believe there is no hope of keeping such things private, effectively removing the concept of privacy from society. The thought of people not knowing occurrences in your life may become foreign entirely. Another possibility is the idea of privacy evolving to only encompass what is on one&#8217;s own mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Private Eyes Are Watching You&#8221; &#8211; Part Two by &#8220;Private Eyes Are Watching You&#8221; &#8211; Part Three &#124; Joel Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=574#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Private Eyes Are Watching You&#8221; &#8211; Part Three &#124; Joel Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=574#comment-5870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the previous part of this series, I laid out the first situation of a thought experiment, where you are being [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the previous part of this series, I laid out the first situation of a thought experiment, where you are being [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Private Eyes Are Watching You&#8221; &#8211; Part One by &#8220;Private Eyes Are Watching You&#8221; &#8211; Part Two &#124; Joel Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=568#comment-5783</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Private Eyes Are Watching You&#8221; &#8211; Part Two &#124; Joel Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=568#comment-5783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the previous part, I set up some basic parameters to discussions of the right to privacy, particularly that I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the previous part, I set up some basic parameters to discussions of the right to privacy, particularly that I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Reflections on a Recently Defended Dissertation by chris</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-5402</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-5402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations! It&#039;s been almost 10 years since I filed and I can still bring back the feelings like it was yesterday. I came across your site while searching for a different Joel Schwartz - he&#039;s got a PhD in biochemistry. But I was happy for your accomplishment, and I&#039;m a lover of philosophy (though I work in molecular biology and computational genomics). Welcome to the club Dr. Schwartz.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! It&#8217;s been almost 10 years since I filed and I can still bring back the feelings like it was yesterday. I came across your site while searching for a different Joel Schwartz &#8211; he&#8217;s got a PhD in biochemistry. But I was happy for your accomplishment, and I&#8217;m a lover of philosophy (though I work in molecular biology and computational genomics). Welcome to the club Dr. Schwartz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Reflections on a Recently Defended Dissertation by Nate</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4346</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Today is a day of celebration, of celebrating the completion of significant accomplishments and future possibilities!&quot; Indeed! Party-on Joel. Congrats!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Today is a day of celebration, of celebrating the completion of significant accomplishments and future possibilities!&#8221; Indeed! Party-on Joel. Congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Reflections on a Recently Defended Dissertation by katie</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4320</link>
		<dc:creator>katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations! I defended my dissertation yesterday, so I am feeling the joy of which you speak! Feels good! I am not sure I will cry too long about not having a dissertation though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! I defended my dissertation yesterday, so I am feeling the joy of which you speak! Feels good! I am not sure I will cry too long about not having a dissertation though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Reflections on a Recently Defended Dissertation by D C Cramer</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>D C Cramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 03:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Stump told me I write like a girl. Not sure what that was supposed to mean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Stump told me I write like a girl. Not sure what that was supposed to mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Reflections on a Recently Defended Dissertation by Jim Stump</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4120</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the record, I do tell a lot of students that they should consider a philosophy major; I don&#039;t tell very many that they write like a philosopher.  You&#039;re in pretty elite company there!

Congratulations again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I do tell a lot of students that they should consider a philosophy major; I don&#8217;t tell very many that they write like a philosopher.  You&#8217;re in pretty elite company there!</p>
<p>Congratulations again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Reflections on a Recently Defended Dissertation by Kristi</title>
		<link>http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4118</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelaschwartz.net/?p=558#comment-4118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow...congratulations, Joel!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;congratulations, Joel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
