04. June 2011 · 2 comments · Categories: Fun · Tags: ,

After a few posts addressing the absurdity of the way the UN handles human rights, I’m starting to think that I was wrong about the UN after hearing their most recent announcement.

A recent UN report has declared that internet access is a human right.*  While my immediate reaction was one of shock and dismay, I realized that I may be looking at it incorrectly.  If internet access is a human right, and human rights must be granted to every human, then everyone has the right to read this website and all of my ideas that are posted on this website.  So instead of the UN trying to undermine me, they’re actually trying to help my ideas get out to the rest of the world, although the cost of transmitting my ideas appears to be the correctness and defensibility of my dissertation.

So, dear readers, should I be thanking the UN for their help in the long term, or criticize them for their attempts to undermine my dissertation in the process?

———————————–

*I am capable of carefully reading the article and noticing that they were claiming that you have the right to not have your internet disconnected by the government rather than being given internet access.  However, that more careful reading would not have allowed the full force of my sarcasm.

28. April 2011 · 1 comment · Categories: Fun · Tags: ,

In a previous post, I complained that the UN was trying to mess up my dissertation by considering giving the same rights to Mother Earth as human beings have.  This move would create serious theoretical problems for my dissertation.

However, this week, they have decided to create practical problems for my dissertation.  If the UN gets their way, not only do I have do defend human rights from Mother Earth, I additionally have to explain how people who obviously abuse human rights can serve on a council to make sure that people don’t abuse human rights.  That would be like having to explain why it is a good idea to have Carl’s Jr in charge of regulating healthy fast food, Hugh Hefner as the chair of a women’s dignity committee, or, most glaringly, Nickelback picking the winners of the Grammys.

I think I may be able to avoid this potential problem in my dissertation, but am not looking forward to having to defend Nickelback at my dissertation defense if someone asks.

I’m doing a dissertation that is about human rights.  I’m in the home stretch and can see the light at the end of the tunnel.  You can imagine my dismay when I read this article today.  Apparently, Bolivia thinks that the UN should give “Mother Earth” the same rights that human beings have.

Given that the dissertation works with the assumption that humans have different rights than other creatures, if this document passes, my dissertation just won’t work anymore, as I can’t use the same lines of reasoning to defend “Mother Earth” rights.

The UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights is problematic enough for a theory of the grounding of human rights.  (I mean, paid vacation as a human right?)  If the UN passes this document, I might as well just give up.

So I guess it’s a race against time.  Can I get my dissertation done before the UN passes this?  I’m going to claim a human right for the chance… at least while I still have distinctly human rights.

Final Stop: Bethel College: “Human Rights and Moral Reasoning: Three Approaches” and “‘It was the best of times.  It was the worst of times.’: Reflections on Graduate School”

Monday morning, I left Berne bright and early to head to Bethel College in Mishawaka, Indiana.  I was a bit late, having hit some unexpected road construction.

Human Rights and Moral Reasoning: Three Approaches

I presented in two classes taught by Brother Tim Erdel in the morning. My presentation focused on three different ways that human rights can be understood and how each of these approaches influences our moral reasoning.  The first approach argues that human rights are about the duties that the government has to its citizens.  The second approach argues that human rights are limiting trumps, dictating what we cannot do to each other.  The final approach argues that human rights are about seeing the dignity of other people as human persons and treating them in accord with that dignity.  After presenting the three views and the way they influence our moral reasoning, the classes discussed which view is the best way to approach human rights.  If we are arguing for a Kingdom ethic, the third approach is the ideal, but given that we live in a fallen world, the second is the way to universally approach human rights.

‘It was the best of times.  It was the worst of times’: Reflections on Graduate School

I spoke at a luncheon for students interested in graduate school, talking about my experiences in applying (both times), working on a masters degree, and the present process of working on my PhD, completing the dissertation, and searching for job.  While I did not shy away from discussing the negatives, I also talked about the good that has come about from this whole process.

Additionally, I was able to connect with different people throughout the day.  During the chapel hour, I saw the ladies of the admissions office who were my supervisors when I worked there during college.  After the luncheon, I had coffee with Matt Yoder, and also with Jim Stump, catching up with both of them, reminding me of the times spent at Bethel having discussions with both of them.  Lisa and Eric Oglesbee had me over for dinner that evening, for a time full of reminiscing and shared experiences in working toward a PhD.  Fittingly, on the way back to Berne, I had a wonderful conversation with another friend from Bethel, Michael From.

It was a time that was good for the soul, returning to the place and professors that played such an important role in shaping me into the person I am today.  It is also the place I met my wife, and we both always fondly remember our time there.

The Return to Waco

Tuesday morning, I said farewell to my parents, after my mom loaded my suitcase with pumpkin cookies (and make up for Jess).  I drove down to Indianapolis, where I was able to meet up with Nate Patterson for coffee and conversation at his place, getting to see his wife, Grace, and son, John, as well.  It was a nice and fitting ending for the trip.

This trip served the purpose of reconnecting with people, presenting some of my ideas, and reminding me that the work I’m doing isn’t limited to my dissertation, isn’t limited to Baylor, and can be applicable for people who aren’t in the philosophical world.  Seeing friends and family only reinforced those things.

A special thanks to Baylor’s philosophy department and graduate school for the generous funding to make this possible.  An additional thanks to John White and Tim Erdel for organizing my opportunities to present at Cedarville and Bethel.

While I have already returned to Waco, I have two more updates (including this one) to write about my first tour.

As a matter of tying up loose ends from the previous post, the pizza from LaRosa’s was everything I could hope for.  If you’re in the Cincinnati area, I highly recommend trying them out.

Stop Two: Midwest EPS (continued)

Saturday morning was the conclusion of the Midwest EPS conference.  Again, there were some compelling papers presented.  At the end of the conference, I was presented with the Outstanding EPS Graduate Student Paper award.  The award came with a book and some cash, and receiving it from Tim Erdel was meaningful as well.

Stop Three: Break in Berne

Saturday afternoon I headed to my parents’ house in Berne, IN.  Josh, Stacy, Jay, and Ashley were all there, as was the star of the weekend, Cambria.  During my time in Berne, I visited both of my grandmas, went to church with my family, and had a lot of fun and relaxation. 

As a matter of fulfilling my duties as an uncle, I was proud to introduce Cambria to the joys of old fashioned cream pie. She gummed the pie multiple times, and ended up with a small piece that she liked.

If you look closely, you’ll notice that she has a firm grip on Uncle Joel’s finger, making sure the pie doesn’t get too far away and pulling it in when she’s ready for her next bite.  Also, please notice that Cambria’s mom (Stacy) is holding her, so I wasn’t getting into too much trouble.  Cambria really enjoyed the pie, and was all too happy to enjoy it again the following day, once again, from Uncle Joel.  I really like being an uncle to Cambria and Sophie (my niece from Kristen).

I always enjoy being with family, and this time was no exception.  Living in Texas, we’ve learned to make the most of the opportunities we get with family in Indiana and Michigan, and hopefully, one day we’ll get closer.

Upcoming: Final Leg and Back to Waco

Since the last post, I met with John White from Cedarville University for a great dinner at Los Mariachis in Xenia, OH.  I ordered the enchiladas (one beef, one chicken) and I was not disappointed.  They have great chips and salsa as well.  Another great find if you’re in that part of Ohio.

I then turned up the music in the car and departed for Cincinnati…err…Covington, Kentucky.  The hotel is just across the Ohio River from Cincinnati.  I’m staying with Brother Tim Erdel and David Cramer, both of Bethel College (although David is preparing to move to Waco to start his PhD in religion at Baylor).  We stayed up far too late watching basketball games (and celebrating the Duke loss), but duty called this morning.

Stop Two: Midwest Regional Evangelical Philosophical Society Conference: “Teaching to Persons, Not Computers”

Arriving at Cincinnati Christian University at 8:00 am, the day began with a plenary session, followed by a day full of excellent, insightful papers from undergraduate students, graduate students, and professors in philosophy. A sincere thanks to Tim Erdel for treating me to lunch today at a Chinese buffet.  Oh, and it snowed today.

I presented my paper “Teaching to Persons, Not Computers”, and it was greeted with much acceptance.  In the paper, I argue that far too often, educators approach their students with expectations that could be met by computers, in a Turing-Test-like fashion.  After presenting Karol Wojtyla’s personalistic view of recognizing human personhood, I argue for personalistic teaching in the classroom, focusing on building relationships with students, allowing expression of the uniqueness of their personhood in assignments, and focusing of the formation of both students and professors.  I discuss some of my experiences in implementing these ideas in the classroom, while recognizing the tension that exists between ideal teaching and realistic budgets.

At the end of the day, David and I came back to the hotel room, and we’re presently waiting on pizza to arrive from LaRosa’s Pizza.  They claim to be Cincinnati’s best pizza, so I hope they live up to their promise.

Tomorrow morning will consist of listening to a few papers, and then heading to Berne to see my parents, my brother Josh, my sister-in-law Stacy, my brother Jay, and my adorable niece Cambria. :)

I’m in the midst of a bit of a tour, speaking at 3 different places between today and Monday.  Today I spoke in a class at Cedarville University on “Hauerwas and Justice”.  Tomorrow, I’ll present my paper “Teaching to Persons, Not Computers” at the Midwest regional Evangelical Philosophical Society conference.  On Monday, I’ll be speaking in two classes at Bethel on “Moral Reasoning and Human Rights – Three Approaches” and at a lunch, giving a talk that I’m calling “‘It Was the Best of Times.  It Was the Worst of Times.’: Reflections on Graduate School”.  I’ll be doing some posts on the road that will include some content, some reviews of dining places, and general thoughts about what’s going on.

Traveling the World…

Yesterday, after teaching my classes in the morning, I traveled up north, flying into Indianapolis, and driving to Dayton, Ohio.  Equipped with my Kindle for the flight, I began reading The Most Human Human: What Talking with Computers Teaches Us About What It Means to Be Alive by Brian Christian.  While I will review the book when I complete it at a later date, it is a book that I’m thoroughly enjoying reading.  Christian was a confederate for the Loebner Prize in 2009 and the book is a discussion of the thoughts and insights he had in preparing for the competition and that emerged following the competition.  The Loebner Prize goes to the “Most Human Computer”, that is, the computer that does the best at trying to convince a human that the computer is human as well through conversation.  Christian was one of the confederates that try to convince another human that he is a human as well.  (All of this is done through chat software in different rooms.)  Given my interest in the Turing Test (off of which this competition is based), I could hardly put the book down during the flight from Dallas to Indy and look forward to continuing it and posting thoughts from it.

The drive from Indianapolis to Dayton was filled with great hits from the 80s, even though the temperature dropped nearly 25 degrees from when I got in the car in Indy till I got to my hotel in Dayton.  Nothing warms my heart like some great 80s music.

This morning on my way to Cedarville, I passed a Tim Horton’s.  Given my love for their donuts and coffee, I had no choice but to stop.  If only all mornings could start that way.  It did slightly redeem the fact that it is the end of March and it was below freezing according to the rental car.

Stop One: Cedarville University: Hauerwas and Justice

My talk at Cedarville was on Hauerwas and Justice, accompanying the class discussion on the chapter in The Peaceable Kingdom on social ethics.  For Hauerwas, justice is a matter of reconciliation between God and humans and between humans.  While this may promote similar actions to a Rawlsian conception of justice as fairness, it is fundamentally different, as it has a different motivation and intention than the Rawlsian conception.  Hauerwas encourages Christians not to compromise what it means to be just in order to “accomplish good” in the world.  Instead of striving to have a society of people who do actions that look like they do just and fair actions, Hauerwas believes that Christians should strive to form a community of people who are actually just.  Formation is much more difficult than imitation (although imitation can play a role in formation), but we should not settle for imitation instead of formation, even if it seems quicker and more effective presently.

The students were responsive and asked insightful questions with thoughtful responses as well.  I’m not sure if that is a reflection of Cedarville’s Biblical and Theological Studies department or the professor, John White, (or both), but I applaud those students and those who are developing those students to be engaged theological persons.

Coffee Shop Review

This afternoon, I’m working from a coffee shop in Cedarville called Stoney Creek Roasters.  I must say that this is possibly the best coffee shop I’ve worked in.  The atmosphere is rustic, yet homey, with good music playing in the background, yet the music is by no means overwhelming. I enjoyed a nice turkey bacon club panini and chips for lunch, along with a raspberry-peach-vanilla soda (both on the recommendation of the cashier).  Both hit the spot and I would definitely get each of them if I were to come a second time.  After my lunch, I buckled down and got to work with a reasonably priced cup of coffee that hit the spot on this cold day.  If I lived in Cedarville, Ohio, I would be a regular here for sure.

Upcoming Plans

Tonight, after dinner, I’m heading to Cincinnati, for tomorrow and Saturday’s Midwest regional Evangelical Philosophical Society conference.   

Jess and I are now on Spring Break and we’re enjoying it.

Jess started her Spring Break with a trip to the Texas Speech-Language Hearing Association conference in Houston this past Thursday through Saturday.  She was the recipient of the Gardner Gateley Scholarship at the conference, for which I’m incredibly proud of her!  She was recognized at a luncheon with other scholarship recipients at the conference.

This afternoon, we’re heading off for a couple days to relax and get away from Waco.  Jess has been itching for a good burger, so there’ll definitely be a trip to Red Robin while we’re away.  Since Jess will have to spend some of the time studying for her upcoming comprehensive exams and Praxis exam, I hope to do some reading for fun (finishingKurt Vonnegut’s Player Piano hopefully) and get some more posts set up, as well as knocking out some lesson plans.

The remainder of Spring Break will be spent working on the never-ending dissertation and watching Purdue win the Big Ten Tournament.  Boiler Up!

Things will be picking up again on here, so stay tuned!

13. February 2011 · 1 comment · Categories: Fun, Life

I recently stumbled on this watch, and realized it is the perfect watch for me*:

As someone who believes that the present is the only time that exists (an A-theorist when it comes to philosophy of time), this watch displays that belief better than other watches.  The past is fading into the distance and the future has yet to become clear.  The present is all there is.

I think that this view has more merits than what are found in philosophical theory.  It additionally has important pragmatic implications.  By focusing on only the present, you don’t needlessly stress about the past, because it has come and gone.  Also, you realize the future has yet to come into existence, so you still have a say in what is to happen.

When it all comes down, I just like the watch.

————————–

* When I say that this would be the perfect watch for me, I mean that I really would love to own this watch.  If anyone, in a fit of spontaneous, extraordinary generosity decided they wanted to buy me this watch, I would prefer the black leather band, but would not object to the steel mesh band either.

12. February 2011 · Write a comment · Categories: Fun, Life, Music · Tags:

This month on Amazon one of my favorite CDs is on sale for $5.  The artist Enigma has a very unique sound, but the lack of lyrics in most of their music makes it a joy to study to. If you were to mix rock, Gregorian chant, new age, electronic, and tribal music into a single artist, you’d get something like Enigma.  It sounds like an odd mix (and it is), but don’t knock it till you hear it.

I was introduced to the group through a sermon a few years ago that used the song “Return to Innocence”.  As the song played near the start of the sermon (I was working out at the time), I remember thinking that I needed to go and listen to the song later.  I downloaded it, and it quickly became one of the most listened to songs in my playlist.  That year for my birthday, Jess bought me this CD for my birthday, and I quickly found that my enjoyment was not limited to that single song, but that all of Enigma’s work I enjoyed.

(Music video for “Return to Innocence”)

I have since expanded beyond this Greatest Hits album to other albums and find that they are also enjoyable.  You almost feel like there is a story being told throughout the album, enhancing each song when understood within that story, although nearly every song can stand well on its own.

With this album being one of Amazon’s $5 albums of the month to download, you could do much worse with that money.  Amazon also listed it as one of the top romantic albums of the monthly deals, just in time for Valentine’s Day.  Give Enigma a try.